Fluorescent Dreams Wax Cylinders - Mildred Loving

5th of May, 2008

11:04 - Mildred Loving

Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry

You probably have never heard of Richard and Mildred Loving.

They had lived in Virginia all their life, and they loved each other. They got married in Washington D.C. in 1958. When they returned to their home in Virginia, this marriage caused anger, attacks, and they were found guilty of a felony.

You see, Mildred was black, and Richard was white. In the trial, the judge said:

"Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his arrangement there would be no cause for such marriages. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix."


Their case, known as Loving v. Virginia, eventually went to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court found that the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protects marriage even between different races. The chief justice, Earl Warren, wrote:

"The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men... To deny this fundamental freedom on so unsupportable a basis as the racial classifications embodied in these statutes, classifications so directly subversive of the principle of equality at the heart of the Fourteenth Amendment, is surely to deprive all the State's citizens of liberty without due process of law. The Fourteenth Amendment requires that the freedom of choice to marry not be restricted by invidious racial discriminations. Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the State."


Mildred Loving died on Friday, May 2, 2008. My heart goes out to her and to her children.

Take care, all.

(Leave a comment)

Comments:

[User Picture]
From:[info]tenacious_snail
Date:2008-May-5 06:51 pm (UTC)
(Link)
thank you for letting me know of her passing.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:[info]davesslave
Date:2008-May-5 07:24 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I admire them for their courage, even if the events that forced them to take this to the Supreme Court was forced on them.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:[info]merle_
Date:2008-May-5 07:43 pm (UTC)
(Link)
My bible must be missing several pages, as I don't recall seeing the section about God creating four different races. Especially when, well, you know, Adam and Eve.

It would be interesting to know on which day he created each of the four, too, because then one could infer a dominance hierarchy. ;-)
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:[info]xolo
Date:2008-May-5 09:07 pm (UTC)
(Link)
It may be...

The story of Noah's sons in Genesis talks of God creating three races, generally considered to be Africans, Europeans and Semites (Jews and Arabs both). Asia was apparently unknown at the time. This system has the distinct advantage of allowing one to refer to the French as 'Gomerites'.

Also, there's a dominance heirarchy explicitly given, with the Africans at the bottom, if one identifies "Sons of Ham" to be Africans. There're vast, vast quantities of pamphlets on this subject from just prior to the American Civil War.

This is one of the odd bits of Sunday School that I distinctly recall. I would have been about seven or eight, so it was 1968 or so, and racial discrimination was firmly in the news. I attended the northern branch of the UMC, which was very much a civil rights church, and opposed to Biblical literalism anyway. We got a lot of sermons and SS lessons about applying critical thinking to the Bible, and not just going along with the traditional interpretations.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:[info]merle_
Date:2008-May-6 02:37 am (UTC)
(Link)
Interesting. I was brought up in the yankee variant of UMC as well, but our bible was highly redacted and modified ("Good News"). I never heard about the sons being the fathers of various races, but could have been doodling during that lecture.

Mmm.. ham...
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:[info]xolo
Date:2008-May-6 02:48 am (UTC)
(Link)
Oh, yes - "Good News for Modern Man". I think I still have mine, with the black and white 'newsprint' cover. IIRC, that was all New Testament, and didn't come out until 1970 or so anyway. That was part of why I fell out with the UMC - I wanted a certain amount of ceremony and solemnity, and a link with the past from church, and they seemed to be moving very strongly away from all that. All that being said 'Good News' is still an excellent resource.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:[info]merle_
Date:2008-May-6 03:09 am (UTC)
(Link)
I was a bit later than you, so my Good News had both Old and New Testaments.. but I agree with you about ceremonies. It was always fun to go to the Episcopal or Catholic churches to participate in (or simply view) their ceremonies: they knew how to grab an audience in a subtle manner. (and the acoustics were far better, but that's related to the instances of the buildings)
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:[info]jrittenhouse
Date:2008-May-5 09:13 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I had forgotten about them; thanks for the reminder.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:[info]polymathwannabe
Date:2008-May-5 09:41 pm (UTC)
(Link)
In school, I was fortunate enough to have a wonderful American History professor who was also a lawyer. He was very passionate about such issues and included this case all of his classes. Sadly, not everyone can have such a teacher, so for those of us who did learn about this case, passing on the knowledge seems like an appropriate tribute to her memory.
Thanks.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:[info]cathouse_blues
Date:2008-May-5 10:41 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I first became familiar with the Lovings via the movie about their case. Gods bless them and their families who stood with them.
(Reply) (Thread)
From:[info]staceey77
Date:2008-May-5 10:53 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Yeah!
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:[info]loranskunky
Date:2008-May-6 01:19 am (UTC)
(Link)
Thank you for reminding me, such a wonderful couple.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:[info]funcrunch
Date:2008-May-6 03:17 am (UTC)
(Link)
Thank you for sharing this. My parents, mother black and father white, were married in 1969, just a decade after the Lovings. Amazing to think that people were, and in many many cases continue to be, so narrow-minded as to make a loving union between two people illegal.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:[info]_wastrel
Date:2008-May-6 03:46 pm (UTC)
(Link)
That the simple fact of loving someone could be subversive says something about the society about the kind of society which is subverted by it. I couldn't have blamed them if they hadn't fought it. The fact that they did and won was an extra step in the direction of those who are still fighting today.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:[info]derumi
Date:2008-May-6 04:11 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Aww. I'm grateful to them.
(Reply) (Thread)